CITI 2026 Peer Review Policy
CITI 2026 follows a rigorous double-blind peer-review model to ensure high scientific quality and publication ethics standards.
Review Process
- all submissions undergo double-blind peer review;
- authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the review process;
- each paper is evaluated by at least 2–3 independent reviewers;
- reviewers are selected based on expertise and absence of conflicts of interest.
Evaluation Criteria
Submissions are evaluated according to:
- originality and novelty;
- technical and scientific quality;
- methodological rigor;
- relevance to conference themes;
- clarity of presentation;
- practical or theoretical contribution.
Decision Process
Final decisions are made by the Program Chairs based on reviewer reports and discussion outcomes.
Possible decisions:
- Accept
- Accept with minor revisions
- Reject